Answer
Verified
376.5k+ views
Hint: Living in harmony with wildlife in a human-dominated environment exemplifies IFAW's philosophy that coexistence is preferable than conflict. People's interactions with natural wildlife are frequently tense. Coyotes, wolves, bears, and beavers are deemed "nuisance" animals that must be controlled. As a result, governments kill millions of animals in cruel ways every year in order to "avoid conflict." This report shows how individuals are coming up with creative, yet easy, ways to coexist with wildlife so that we can coexist with them. IFAW recognises that native animal species are not only crucial to protect, but they are also vital to the ecosystem and the environment.
Complete answer:
No, because non-avian dinosaurs became extinct roughly 66 million years ago during the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction, and the genus Homo (Humans – Homo sapiens) only arose about \[3\] million years ago. Dinosaurs coexisted with little animals that looked like shrews.
People did not appear on Earth for millions of years after the dinosaurs went out. Small mammals, on the other hand, were living throughout the time of the dinosaurs. Many dinosaur researchers now believe that birds are direct descendants of one line of carnivorous dinosaurs, and some even believe that they are modern-day dinosaurs. This notion is still being debated, demonstrating that there is still a lot we don't know about dinosaurs.
Young Earth creationists and other groups commonly hold the pseudoscientific and pseudo historical belief that non-avian dinosaurs and humans coexisted in the past or still do so today.
All birds are dinosaurs that descended from feathered theropods, according to mainstream science. Since the earliest humans arrived on Earth, humanity has coexisted with dinosaurs in this broad and more technical sense. However, in a more narrow and colloquial sense, the name "dinosaur" refers to non-avian dinosaurs, all of which perished during the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction, while Homo sapiens arose only a few million years ago.
Note:
Benefits of coexistence-
Humane strategies that emphasise coexistence and are adaptable to context and changing conditions throughout time, according to the best available evidence, are more effective at preventing or reducing conflicts and wildlife management expenses in the long run.
Because of the unfavourable perceptions associated with the mere presence of a wild animal, human-wildlife encounters are characterised as "conflict." In many cases, the remedies focus on resolving concerns and altering human behaviour to reduce human-wildlife interactions.
Complete answer:
No, because non-avian dinosaurs became extinct roughly 66 million years ago during the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction, and the genus Homo (Humans – Homo sapiens) only arose about \[3\] million years ago. Dinosaurs coexisted with little animals that looked like shrews.
People did not appear on Earth for millions of years after the dinosaurs went out. Small mammals, on the other hand, were living throughout the time of the dinosaurs. Many dinosaur researchers now believe that birds are direct descendants of one line of carnivorous dinosaurs, and some even believe that they are modern-day dinosaurs. This notion is still being debated, demonstrating that there is still a lot we don't know about dinosaurs.
Young Earth creationists and other groups commonly hold the pseudoscientific and pseudo historical belief that non-avian dinosaurs and humans coexisted in the past or still do so today.
All birds are dinosaurs that descended from feathered theropods, according to mainstream science. Since the earliest humans arrived on Earth, humanity has coexisted with dinosaurs in this broad and more technical sense. However, in a more narrow and colloquial sense, the name "dinosaur" refers to non-avian dinosaurs, all of which perished during the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction, while Homo sapiens arose only a few million years ago.
Note:
Benefits of coexistence-
Humane strategies that emphasise coexistence and are adaptable to context and changing conditions throughout time, according to the best available evidence, are more effective at preventing or reducing conflicts and wildlife management expenses in the long run.
Because of the unfavourable perceptions associated with the mere presence of a wild animal, human-wildlife encounters are characterised as "conflict." In many cases, the remedies focus on resolving concerns and altering human behaviour to reduce human-wildlife interactions.
Recently Updated Pages
Identify the feminine gender noun from the given sentence class 10 english CBSE
Your club organized a blood donation camp in your city class 10 english CBSE
Choose the correct meaning of the idiomphrase from class 10 english CBSE
Identify the neuter gender noun from the given sentence class 10 english CBSE
Choose the word which best expresses the meaning of class 10 english CBSE
Choose the word which is closest to the opposite in class 10 english CBSE
Trending doubts
Which of the following is the capital of the union class 9 social science CBSE
Fill the blanks with the suitable prepositions 1 The class 9 english CBSE
Name the metals of the coins Tanka Shashgani and Jital class 6 social science CBSE
Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?
How do you graph the function fx 4x class 9 maths CBSE
The Equation xxx + 2 is Satisfied when x is Equal to Class 10 Maths
Change the following sentences into negative and interrogative class 10 english CBSE
Difference between Prokaryotic cell and Eukaryotic class 11 biology CBSE
10 examples of friction in our daily life