The hyper conjugative stabilities of tert-butyl cation and $2$-butene, respectively, are due to:
A. $\sigma \to p$ (empty) and $\sigma \to {{\pi }^{*}}$ electron delocalisations.
B. $\sigma \to {{\sigma }^{*}}$ and $\sigma \to \pi $ electron delocalisations.
C. $\sigma \to p$ (filled) and $\sigma \to \pi $ electron delocalisations.
D. $p (filled)\to {{\sigma }^{*}}$ and $\sigma \to {{\pi }^{*}}$ electron delocalisations.
Answer
Verified
464.4k+ views
Hint: To find out the correct option for the given question, you have to state what is hyperconjugation and what is the reason behind the hyperconjugation. Try to state about the interaction of the electrons present in different orbitals.
Complete step by step answer:
So, to find the appropriate solution let us first know about what is hyperconjugation.
Hyperconjugation is the stabilising interaction which further results from the interaction of the electrons in a sigma bond, which is denoted by $\sigma $ (usually between a carbon and hydrogen atom or a carbon and carbon atom) with an adjacent empty or partially filled non-bonding p-orbital or an antibonding $\pi $ orbital or filled $\pi $ orbital, to give an extended molecular orbital that increases that stability of the system or compound. So, the hyperconjugation ultimately results in the extended molecular orbital and increases the stability of the compound.
So, we can say that the systems containing a delocalisation in $\sigma \to p$(empty) orbital or $\sigma \to p$(partly filled) orbital or $\sigma \to {{\pi }^{*}}$ orbital or in $\sigma \to \pi $ orbital will tend to give an extended molecular orbital and increase their stability.
Now, let us look on the compounds given in the question and see what type of delocalisation they have.
So, in case of tert-butyl cation, the hyperconjugation is due to the interaction of the electrons in the $\sigma $ bond with the adjacent empty p-orbital.
While in case of $2$-butene, the hyperconjugation is due to the interaction of $\sigma $ orbital electrons with the antibonding $\pi $ orbital electrons (${{\pi }^{*}}$).
Therefore, the hyper conjugative stabilities of tert-butyl cation and $2$-butene, respectively, are due to $\sigma \to p$ (empty) and $\sigma \to {{\pi }^{*}}$ electron delocalisations.
So, the correct answer is “Option A”.
Note: The stabilisation due to hyperconjugation arises because the orbital interaction leads to the electrons being in a lower energy orbital. The more hyperconjugation there is, the greater the stabilisation of the system. It is also known as “no bond resonance”.
Complete step by step answer:
So, to find the appropriate solution let us first know about what is hyperconjugation.
Hyperconjugation is the stabilising interaction which further results from the interaction of the electrons in a sigma bond, which is denoted by $\sigma $ (usually between a carbon and hydrogen atom or a carbon and carbon atom) with an adjacent empty or partially filled non-bonding p-orbital or an antibonding $\pi $ orbital or filled $\pi $ orbital, to give an extended molecular orbital that increases that stability of the system or compound. So, the hyperconjugation ultimately results in the extended molecular orbital and increases the stability of the compound.
So, we can say that the systems containing a delocalisation in $\sigma \to p$(empty) orbital or $\sigma \to p$(partly filled) orbital or $\sigma \to {{\pi }^{*}}$ orbital or in $\sigma \to \pi $ orbital will tend to give an extended molecular orbital and increase their stability.
Now, let us look on the compounds given in the question and see what type of delocalisation they have.
So, in case of tert-butyl cation, the hyperconjugation is due to the interaction of the electrons in the $\sigma $ bond with the adjacent empty p-orbital.
While in case of $2$-butene, the hyperconjugation is due to the interaction of $\sigma $ orbital electrons with the antibonding $\pi $ orbital electrons (${{\pi }^{*}}$).
Therefore, the hyper conjugative stabilities of tert-butyl cation and $2$-butene, respectively, are due to $\sigma \to p$ (empty) and $\sigma \to {{\pi }^{*}}$ electron delocalisations.
So, the correct answer is “Option A”.
Note: The stabilisation due to hyperconjugation arises because the orbital interaction leads to the electrons being in a lower energy orbital. The more hyperconjugation there is, the greater the stabilisation of the system. It is also known as “no bond resonance”.
Recently Updated Pages
Class 11 Question and Answer - Your Ultimate Solutions Guide
Master Class 11 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success
Master Class 11 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success
Master Class 11 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success
Master Class 11 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success
Master Class 11 Economics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success
Trending doubts
10 examples of friction in our daily life
What problem did Carter face when he reached the mummy class 11 english CBSE
Difference Between Prokaryotic Cells and Eukaryotic Cells
State and prove Bernoullis theorem class 11 physics CBSE
Proton was discovered by A Thomson B Rutherford C Chadwick class 11 chemistry CBSE
Petromyzon belongs to class A Osteichthyes B Chondrichthyes class 11 biology CBSE