Answer
Verified449.4k+ views
Hint: Convert the above points into their opposites and create a paragraph and link them together. Make sure that all the points are connected. Expand the opposite of each idea given above.
Complete answer:
The given question asks us to write a counter view, which means we need to disprove the given points. The given section is the view section which is the original argument being made for the given sentence in the question. This means that we need to write against the given sentence.
There is also a word limit that we need to follow, i.e. 120 words. So, our paragraph has
to be around 120 words or more. The counter view section should always be in a
paragraph and have a title above it. This means that the negation of the sentence will be
the title of the counter view section.
All we have to do is argue against each of the points made in the view section and expand
our points.
Crackers should not be burst to express happiness
I strongly oppose the conviction that crackers should be burst to express happiness. They are very harmful to the environment. It is not right to put the symbolising of joy before the well-being of our entire planet. Pollution affects everyone around us. While they illuminate the sky, they also create a lot of noise which leads to noise pollution. The crackers are so loud that they can be heard from several meters away. This can affect senior citizens living around the area and can cause health problems and anxiety. The pets and stray animals are also affected by this, and they can also get injured. Children are not usually fans of crackers, it is very rare for children to enjoy crackers. They get scared of the noise, and the bright lights. Not to mention, they are very unsafe for children. They can also lead to breathing problems and cause asthma. So, it is immoral and irresponsible to burst crackers.
Note: Use the given format to write the required solution. Add additional information to make the given information into a paragraph.
Complete answer:
The given question asks us to write a counter view, which means we need to disprove the given points. The given section is the view section which is the original argument being made for the given sentence in the question. This means that we need to write against the given sentence.
There is also a word limit that we need to follow, i.e. 120 words. So, our paragraph has
to be around 120 words or more. The counter view section should always be in a
paragraph and have a title above it. This means that the negation of the sentence will be
the title of the counter view section.
All we have to do is argue against each of the points made in the view section and expand
our points.
Crackers should not be burst to express happiness
I strongly oppose the conviction that crackers should be burst to express happiness. They are very harmful to the environment. It is not right to put the symbolising of joy before the well-being of our entire planet. Pollution affects everyone around us. While they illuminate the sky, they also create a lot of noise which leads to noise pollution. The crackers are so loud that they can be heard from several meters away. This can affect senior citizens living around the area and can cause health problems and anxiety. The pets and stray animals are also affected by this, and they can also get injured. Children are not usually fans of crackers, it is very rare for children to enjoy crackers. They get scared of the noise, and the bright lights. Not to mention, they are very unsafe for children. They can also lead to breathing problems and cause asthma. So, it is immoral and irresponsible to burst crackers.
Note: Use the given format to write the required solution. Add additional information to make the given information into a paragraph.
Students Also Read