Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store

How were the effects of America’s isolationism and Britain’s policy of appeasement similar?

seo-qna
SearchIcon
Answer
VerifiedVerified
430.5k+ views
Hint: The common purpose of both the policies was related to peacekeeping. Isolationism is belief under which political ties are meant to be avoided. On the other hand, the policy of appeasement involves giving in to the aggressors.

Complete answer:
During the 1930s, isolationism was an integral part of the American policy. It desired to keep out of distant wars in Europe and Asia with a strong pro-German sympathy. Most people believed that the country had to put in a lot of efforts to combat the Great Depression. Some historians argued that World War I had been a sordid scramble among imperialist powers for wealth which made it very much in best interest of peace and democracy that the United States avoid overseas wars. There were numerous neutrality legislation. For example, American citizens were prohibited from traveling on ships operated by belligerents, cash-and-carry" provisions and arms length approaches imposed on President Roosevelt by Congress pointed towards a lot of public misgivings regarding making the United States a target. The success of the Nazi blitzkrieg and aerial pummeling of Britain in 1940 changed that American opinion of isolationism and extend support to besieged countries.

Similarly, Similarly British appeasement wanted to stay away from the European wars considering its condition post World War 1. It was reluctant to fight against Germany due to various economic and political fallouts. Neville Chamberlain became British Prime Minister in 1937 followed the policy of appeasement until 1939.

Note:We can safely conclude that both the aforementioned policies were similar as they wanted to avoid conflict, Hitler and his aggression. They believed that what was happening at a distant location in the world would not happen closer to home. Ultimately, both policies turned out to be short sighted and extremely unsuccessful as there was a potential of fascist aggression to grow, which it did.