Question

The right to Freedom of Speech in India may be restricted, if the freedom is used to ______.
(A) Incite people to violence
(B) Propagate nationalisation of the private sector
(C) Level charges of corruption against those in power
(D) Spread superstition

Answer 1

Hint: An essential component of a practical majority rule government is to permit all residents to take an interest in the political and social cycles of the nation. There is an adequate right to speak freely, though, and articulation in all structures in an ideal democratic government. The right to speak freely of discourse is ensured by the Indian Constitution as well as by global resolutions.

Complete answer:
The Supreme Court of India had asked the Law Commission to make suggestions to the Parliament to engage the Election Commission to confine the issue of "hate addresses" independent of, at whatever point made. Yet, the Law Commission prescribed that few variables should be considered before confining a discourse. For art, the court has held that "the art should be so preponderating as to toss profanity into a shadow or the foulness so inconsequential and unimportant that it can have no impact and might be neglected." Article 19(2) embeds conventionality or ethical quality as a justification for limiting the right to speak freely and articulation. Segments 292 to 294 of the Indian Penal Code give occasions of limitations on this opportunity in light of a legitimate concern for conventionality or ethical quality.

Thus, option (A) is correct.

Note: This is significant because the democratic system functions admirably just if individuals reserve the privilege to communicate their assessments about the public authority and scrutinize it if necessary. Limitations on the ability to speak freely of any resident might be put as much by an activity of the state as by its inaction. This implies that the disappointment of the State to ensure this opportunity to all classes of residents will be an infringement of their essential rights.