Question

Sovereignty under the Constitution belongs to ___________.
A. the President
B. the Parliament
C. the People
D. the Executive, Judiciary, and Legislature.

Answer 1

Hint: Individuals are the sovereign in India since individuals have an incomparable position and force. Sway is a cardinal element of the preface of India.

Complete answer:
In the dynamic cycle of the state and the support of the request. The idea of power—one of the most dubious thoughts in political theory and worldwide law—is firmly identified with the troublesome ideas of state and government and of autonomy and vote based system. Gotten from the Latin superanus through the French souveraineté, the term was initially perceived to mean what might be compared to preeminent force. Be that as it may, its application by and by frequently has withdrawn from this conventional significance.

In the sixteenth century, France Jean Bodin utilized the new idea of sway to reinforce the intensity of the French ruler over the defiant primitive rulers, encouraging the change from feudalism to patriotism. The scholar who did the most to furnish the term with its advanced significance was the English logician Thomas Hobbes, who contended that in each evident express some individual or assemblage of people should have a definitive and supreme position to proclaim the law; to partition this power, he held, was basically to annihilate the solidarity of the state. The speculations of the English rationalist John Locke and the French thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau that the state depends on a formal or casual minimization of its residents, an implicit agreement through which they endow such powers to an administration as might be fundamental for basic security—prompted the advancement of the convention of mainstream sway that discovered articulation in the American Declaration of Independence in 1776.

Thus, option (C) is correct.

Note: Another curve was given to the idea by the assertion in the French constitution of 1791 that it has a place with the Nation; no gathering can ascribe power to itself nor can an individual arrogate it to himself." Thus, the possibility of mainstream sway practiced fundamentally by individuals got joined with the possibility of public sway practiced not by chaotic people in the condition of nature, yet by a country epitomized in a coordinated state. In the nineteenth century the English law specialist John Austin (1790–1859) built up the idea further by exploring who practices power for the sake of individuals or of the state; he presumed that sway is vested in a country's parliament.