Answer
Verified
447.9k+ views
Hint: We will first find the inequality for two numbers a and b, and then extend it to any n numbers using Cauchy induction.
Complete step by step solution: First let’s try to prove that \[\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}\] for any two numbers a and b, both > 0
We know
\[\text{GM}\,\text{=}\,\sqrt{\text{ab}}\,\text{=}\,\dfrac{\sqrt{\text{a}}\sqrt{\text{b}}\text{+}\sqrt{\text{b}}\sqrt{\text{a}}}{\text{2}}\,\le \,\dfrac{\sqrt{\text{a}}\sqrt{\text{a}}\text{+}\sqrt{\text{b}}\sqrt{\text{b}}}{\text{2}}\,\text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{a+b}}{\text{2}}\]
Why is $\sqrt{\text{a}}\sqrt{\text{b}}\text{+}\sqrt{\text{b}}\sqrt{\text{a}}\,\text{}\sqrt{\text{a}}\sqrt{\text{a}}\text{+}\sqrt{\text{b}}\sqrt{\text{b}}\,\text{=}\,\text{a+b ?}$
Consider ${{\left( \sqrt{a}-\sqrt{b} \right)}^{2}}$ which we know has to be $\ge \,0$
Expanding,
$\begin{align}
& a+b-2\sqrt{ab}\,\ge \,0 \\
& \therefore \,a+b\,\ge \,2\sqrt{ab}\,=\,\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}+\sqrt{b}\sqrt{a} \\
\end{align}$ .
Now let’s try to prove that $\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$.
\[\text{HM}\,\text{of}\,\text{a}\,\text{and}\,\text{b}\,\text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{2ab}}{\text{a+b}}\]
Let us compute $\text{GM}-\text{HM}$
\[\begin{align}
& \text{=}\,\sqrt{\text{ab}}\,\text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{2ab}}{\text{(a+b)}} \\
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{(a+b)}\sqrt{\text{ab}}\text{-2}\sqrt{\text{ab}}\text{.}\sqrt{\text{ab}}}{\text{(a+b)}} \\
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\sqrt{\text{ab}}\text{ }\!\![\!\!\text{ a+b }\!\!]\!\!\text{ -2}\sqrt{\text{ab}}}{\text{a+b}} \\
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\sqrt{\text{ab}}{{\left[ \sqrt{\text{a}}\text{-}\sqrt{\text{b}} \right]}^{\text{2}}}}{\text{a+b}}
\end{align}\]
Which has to be positive because a, b >0
$\therefore $ if $\begin{align}
& \text{GM}-\text{HM}\,\ge \,\text{0} \\
& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM} \\
\end{align}$
So we get the inequality $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$ for two positive numbers a and b, with the equality occurring when both a and b are equal
Ideally, the solution ends right here and we can choose $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$ Option C as the right answer. However, for the sake of completion, we will use Cauchy induction to prove $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$ for any N positive numbers. $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$ will be a direct result of $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$. This will be done as an extra exercise in the note.
Note: Note: We know $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$ for 2 variables. We next prove that if the inequality holds for n variables, then it holds for 2n variables.
Let it hold true for n variables. Let ${{\text{A}}_{\text{n}\,}}\text{,}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\text{,}\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{2n}}}$ denote arithmetic means of $\left( a,\,...,\,{{a}_{n}} \right)$ q\[\text{(}{{\text{a}}_{\text{n+1}}}\text{,}.....\text{,}\,{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}\text{)}\,\text{,}\,\text{(}{{\text{a}}_{\text{1}}}\text{,}\,...\text{,}\,{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}\text{)}\] respectively; let ${{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\text{,}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\text{,}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{2n}}}$ denote their geometric means. Then
\[{{\text{G}}_{\text{2n}}}\,=\,\sqrt{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}}\,\le \,\dfrac{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{+}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}\,\le \,\dfrac{{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}\,=\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{2n}}}\]
Why? $\begin{align}
& {{G}_{n}}\,=\,\sqrt[n]{{{a}_{1}}.....{{a}_{n}}} \\
& {{G}_{n}}\,=\,\sqrt[n]{{{a}_{n+1}}.....{{a}_{2n}}} \\
\end{align}$ But \[\begin{align}
& {{\text{G}}_{\text{2n}}}\,\text{=}\,\sqrt[\text{2n}]{{{\text{a}}_{\text{1}}}.....{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}} \\
& \text{=}\,{{\left( \,\sqrt[\text{2n}]{{{\text{a}}_{\text{1}}}.....{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}}\text{.}\,\sqrt[\text{2n}]{{{\text{a}}_{\text{n+1}}}.....{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}} \right)}^{{}^{\text{1}}/{}_{\text{2}}}} \\
& \text{=}\sqrt{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}} \\
\end{align}\]
Now \[\sqrt{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\,\le \,\dfrac{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{+}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}}\]
because $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$ holds for ${{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}$ and ${{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}$ and $\dfrac{{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\text{+}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}\,\ge \,\dfrac{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\text{+}{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}$ because ${{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\ge \,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}$ and \[\text{A}{{\text{ }\!\!'\!\!\text{ }}_{\text{n}}}\,\ge \,\text{G}{{\text{ }\!\!'\!\!\text{ }}_{\text{n}}}\]
These results show by induction holds for \[\text{n}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{2}}^{\text{k}}}\] for all integers k. For every integer n, there is an N > n such that the theorem holds for N variables.
Now finally, we show that if N > n, and the theorem holds for N variables, then it holds for n variables with
$\text{AM}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{and}\,\text{GM}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}$
Set ${{\text{b}}_{\text{k}}}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{a}}_{\text{k}}}$ for $1\,\le \,\text{k}\,\le \,\text{n}$ and let ${{\text{b}}_{\text{k}}}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{a}}_{\text{n}}}$ for $\text{n}\,\text{}\,\text{k}\le \,\text{N}$.
Then.
\[G_{n}^{n/N}.\,A_{n}^{(N-n)/N}\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}}\,\le \,\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{{{b}_{i/N}}}\,=\,{{A}_{n}}\]
How?
\[\begin{align}
& {{G}_{n}}\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}{b_{i}^{1/N}} \\
& {{G}_{N}}\,=\,\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}}=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}{b_{i}^{1/n}}.\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}} \\
\end{align}\]
But from $i\,=\,n+1$ to $N\,{{b}_{1\,}}=\,{{A}_{n}}$ N for all i
So\[{{G}_{N}}\,=\,\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}}=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}{b_{i}^{1/n}}.A_{n}^{\dfrac{N-n}{n}}\]
How is\[\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}}\,\le \,\sum\limits_{i=1}^{N}{\dfrac{{{b}_{i}}}{N}}\,?\,\] sunoke yse if $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$
But\[\begin{align}
& \sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{N}}{\dfrac{{{\text{b}}_{\text{i}}}}{\text{N}}}\,\text{=}\,\sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{n}}{\dfrac{{{\text{b}}_{\text{i}}}}{\text{N}}}\text{+}\sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{N}}{\dfrac{{{\text{b}}_{\text{i}}}}{\text{N}}} \\
& {{\text{b}}_{\text{i}\,}}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{for}\,\text{all}\,\text{i}\,\text{here} \\
\end{align}\]
\[\begin{align}
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{1}}{\text{N}}\,\text{ }\!\!\times\!\!\text{ n}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{+}\,\dfrac{\text{(N-n)}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{N}} \\
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{N}}{\text{N}}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}} \\
\end{align}\]
So we have proved $\text{G}_{\text{n}}^{\text{n/N}}\text{A}_{\text{n}}^{\text{(N-n)/N}}\le \,{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}$
Cross multiply, we get
$\text{G}_{\text{n}}^{\text{n/N}}\le \text{A}_{\text{n}}^{\text{(N-n)/N}}$
Now, we know $\dfrac{\sum\limits_{i-1}^{n}{\sqrt{\dfrac{{{x}_{1}}{{x}_{2}}...{{x}_{n}}}{{{x}_{i}}n}}}}{n}\ge \,1$ (result of $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$
Which means$\sqrt[\text{n}]{{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}{{\text{x}}_{\text{2}}}...{{\text{x}}_{\text{n}}}}\dfrac{\sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{n}}{\dfrac{\text{1}}{{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}}}}{\text{n}}$
So $\sqrt[\text{n}]{{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}{{\text{x}}_{\text{2}}}...{{\text{x}}_{\text{n}}}}\dfrac{\text{n}}{\sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{n}}{\dfrac{\text{1}}{{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}}}}$ which means $\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$
Complete step by step solution: First let’s try to prove that \[\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}\] for any two numbers a and b, both > 0
We know
\[\text{GM}\,\text{=}\,\sqrt{\text{ab}}\,\text{=}\,\dfrac{\sqrt{\text{a}}\sqrt{\text{b}}\text{+}\sqrt{\text{b}}\sqrt{\text{a}}}{\text{2}}\,\le \,\dfrac{\sqrt{\text{a}}\sqrt{\text{a}}\text{+}\sqrt{\text{b}}\sqrt{\text{b}}}{\text{2}}\,\text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{a+b}}{\text{2}}\]
Why is $\sqrt{\text{a}}\sqrt{\text{b}}\text{+}\sqrt{\text{b}}\sqrt{\text{a}}\,\text{}\sqrt{\text{a}}\sqrt{\text{a}}\text{+}\sqrt{\text{b}}\sqrt{\text{b}}\,\text{=}\,\text{a+b ?}$
Consider ${{\left( \sqrt{a}-\sqrt{b} \right)}^{2}}$ which we know has to be $\ge \,0$
Expanding,
$\begin{align}
& a+b-2\sqrt{ab}\,\ge \,0 \\
& \therefore \,a+b\,\ge \,2\sqrt{ab}\,=\,\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}+\sqrt{b}\sqrt{a} \\
\end{align}$ .
Now let’s try to prove that $\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$.
\[\text{HM}\,\text{of}\,\text{a}\,\text{and}\,\text{b}\,\text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{2ab}}{\text{a+b}}\]
Let us compute $\text{GM}-\text{HM}$
\[\begin{align}
& \text{=}\,\sqrt{\text{ab}}\,\text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{2ab}}{\text{(a+b)}} \\
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{(a+b)}\sqrt{\text{ab}}\text{-2}\sqrt{\text{ab}}\text{.}\sqrt{\text{ab}}}{\text{(a+b)}} \\
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\sqrt{\text{ab}}\text{ }\!\![\!\!\text{ a+b }\!\!]\!\!\text{ -2}\sqrt{\text{ab}}}{\text{a+b}} \\
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\sqrt{\text{ab}}{{\left[ \sqrt{\text{a}}\text{-}\sqrt{\text{b}} \right]}^{\text{2}}}}{\text{a+b}}
\end{align}\]
Which has to be positive because a, b >0
$\therefore $ if $\begin{align}
& \text{GM}-\text{HM}\,\ge \,\text{0} \\
& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM} \\
\end{align}$
So we get the inequality $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$ for two positive numbers a and b, with the equality occurring when both a and b are equal
Ideally, the solution ends right here and we can choose $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$ Option C as the right answer. However, for the sake of completion, we will use Cauchy induction to prove $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$ for any N positive numbers. $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$ will be a direct result of $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$. This will be done as an extra exercise in the note.
Note: Note: We know $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$ for 2 variables. We next prove that if the inequality holds for n variables, then it holds for 2n variables.
Let it hold true for n variables. Let ${{\text{A}}_{\text{n}\,}}\text{,}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\text{,}\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{2n}}}$ denote arithmetic means of $\left( a,\,...,\,{{a}_{n}} \right)$ q\[\text{(}{{\text{a}}_{\text{n+1}}}\text{,}.....\text{,}\,{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}\text{)}\,\text{,}\,\text{(}{{\text{a}}_{\text{1}}}\text{,}\,...\text{,}\,{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}\text{)}\] respectively; let ${{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\text{,}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\text{,}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{2n}}}$ denote their geometric means. Then
\[{{\text{G}}_{\text{2n}}}\,=\,\sqrt{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}}\,\le \,\dfrac{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{+}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}\,\le \,\dfrac{{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}\,=\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{2n}}}\]
Why? $\begin{align}
& {{G}_{n}}\,=\,\sqrt[n]{{{a}_{1}}.....{{a}_{n}}} \\
& {{G}_{n}}\,=\,\sqrt[n]{{{a}_{n+1}}.....{{a}_{2n}}} \\
\end{align}$ But \[\begin{align}
& {{\text{G}}_{\text{2n}}}\,\text{=}\,\sqrt[\text{2n}]{{{\text{a}}_{\text{1}}}.....{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}} \\
& \text{=}\,{{\left( \,\sqrt[\text{2n}]{{{\text{a}}_{\text{1}}}.....{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}}\text{.}\,\sqrt[\text{2n}]{{{\text{a}}_{\text{n+1}}}.....{{\text{a}}_{\text{2n}}}} \right)}^{{}^{\text{1}}/{}_{\text{2}}}} \\
& \text{=}\sqrt{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}} \\
\end{align}\]
Now \[\sqrt{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\,\le \,\dfrac{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{+}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}}\]
because $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$ holds for ${{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}$ and ${{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}$ and $\dfrac{{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\text{+}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}\,\ge \,\dfrac{{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}\text{+}{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{2}}$ because ${{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\ge \,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}$ and \[\text{A}{{\text{ }\!\!'\!\!\text{ }}_{\text{n}}}\,\ge \,\text{G}{{\text{ }\!\!'\!\!\text{ }}_{\text{n}}}\]
These results show by induction holds for \[\text{n}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{2}}^{\text{k}}}\] for all integers k. For every integer n, there is an N > n such that the theorem holds for N variables.
Now finally, we show that if N > n, and the theorem holds for N variables, then it holds for n variables with
$\text{AM}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{and}\,\text{GM}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{G}}_{\text{n}}}$
Set ${{\text{b}}_{\text{k}}}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{a}}_{\text{k}}}$ for $1\,\le \,\text{k}\,\le \,\text{n}$ and let ${{\text{b}}_{\text{k}}}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{a}}_{\text{n}}}$ for $\text{n}\,\text{}\,\text{k}\le \,\text{N}$.
Then.
\[G_{n}^{n/N}.\,A_{n}^{(N-n)/N}\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}}\,\le \,\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{{{b}_{i/N}}}\,=\,{{A}_{n}}\]
How?
\[\begin{align}
& {{G}_{n}}\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}{b_{i}^{1/N}} \\
& {{G}_{N}}\,=\,\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}}=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}{b_{i}^{1/n}}.\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}} \\
\end{align}\]
But from $i\,=\,n+1$ to $N\,{{b}_{1\,}}=\,{{A}_{n}}$ N for all i
So\[{{G}_{N}}\,=\,\,=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}}=\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}{b_{i}^{1/n}}.A_{n}^{\dfrac{N-n}{n}}\]
How is\[\,\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{b_{i}^{1/N}}\,\le \,\sum\limits_{i=1}^{N}{\dfrac{{{b}_{i}}}{N}}\,?\,\] sunoke yse if $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$
But\[\begin{align}
& \sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{N}}{\dfrac{{{\text{b}}_{\text{i}}}}{\text{N}}}\,\text{=}\,\sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{n}}{\dfrac{{{\text{b}}_{\text{i}}}}{\text{N}}}\text{+}\sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{N}}{\dfrac{{{\text{b}}_{\text{i}}}}{\text{N}}} \\
& {{\text{b}}_{\text{i}\,}}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{for}\,\text{all}\,\text{i}\,\text{here} \\
\end{align}\]
\[\begin{align}
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{1}}{\text{N}}\,\text{ }\!\!\times\!\!\text{ n}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{+}\,\dfrac{\text{(N-n)}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}}{\text{N}} \\
& \text{=}\,\dfrac{\text{N}}{\text{N}}{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}\,\text{=}\,{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}} \\
\end{align}\]
So we have proved $\text{G}_{\text{n}}^{\text{n/N}}\text{A}_{\text{n}}^{\text{(N-n)/N}}\le \,{{\text{A}}_{\text{n}}}$
Cross multiply, we get
$\text{G}_{\text{n}}^{\text{n/N}}\le \text{A}_{\text{n}}^{\text{(N-n)/N}}$
Now, we know $\dfrac{\sum\limits_{i-1}^{n}{\sqrt{\dfrac{{{x}_{1}}{{x}_{2}}...{{x}_{n}}}{{{x}_{i}}n}}}}{n}\ge \,1$ (result of $\text{AM}\,\ge \,\text{GM}$
Which means$\sqrt[\text{n}]{{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}{{\text{x}}_{\text{2}}}...{{\text{x}}_{\text{n}}}}\dfrac{\sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{n}}{\dfrac{\text{1}}{{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}}}}{\text{n}}$
So $\sqrt[\text{n}]{{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}{{\text{x}}_{\text{2}}}...{{\text{x}}_{\text{n}}}}\dfrac{\text{n}}{\sum\limits_{\text{i=1}}^{\text{n}}{\dfrac{\text{1}}{{{\text{x}}_{\text{1}}}}}}$ which means $\text{GM}\,\ge \,\text{HM}$
Recently Updated Pages
How many sigma and pi bonds are present in HCequiv class 11 chemistry CBSE
Mark and label the given geoinformation on the outline class 11 social science CBSE
When people say No pun intended what does that mea class 8 english CBSE
Name the states which share their boundary with Indias class 9 social science CBSE
Give an account of the Northern Plains of India class 9 social science CBSE
Change the following sentences into negative and interrogative class 10 english CBSE
Trending doubts
Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?
Difference between Prokaryotic cell and Eukaryotic class 11 biology CBSE
Fill the blanks with the suitable prepositions 1 The class 9 english CBSE
Difference Between Plant Cell and Animal Cell
Give 10 examples for herbs , shrubs , climbers , creepers
Differentiate between homogeneous and heterogeneous class 12 chemistry CBSE
The Equation xxx + 2 is Satisfied when x is Equal to Class 10 Maths
How do you graph the function fx 4x class 9 maths CBSE
Write a letter to the principal requesting him to grant class 10 english CBSE